|
The global capitalistic system is a fascinating
mechanism to watch. During recent months, we've seen the stock market
plummet and reverse itself. Financial markets overseas teeter-totter.
We've seen the largest proposed merger in history, that of Exxon Corp.
and Mobil Corp. We're witnessing an apparent attempt by the U.S.
Department of Justice to do some unpleasant things to Microsoft Corp.
And Y2K looms in less than a year.
That same dynamism and uncertainty is mirrored to
some degree in the insurance industry-mergers, consolidations, the
advent of new technologies, natural disasters.
Yet, for providers of risk management information
systems, things are seemingly less volatile. It seems to be a mature
marketplace with few new major entries providing full-scale system
solutions.
But underneath the surface of complacency, there
are rumblings. For example, technological advancement is a given.
Continued development in areas such as browser-based technology,
database duplication and improvements in expert systems all contribute
to a more dynamic environment. Also, there is the potential expansion
of risk management as an industry itself.
The expansion of risk management beyond its
traditional boundaries, espoused by many industry mavens, such as
retired Microsoft risk manager Scott K. Lange, will have an impact
upon the industry. Integrated 24-hour systems are becoming more
common. Finally, many industry leaders in brokerage houses,
third-party administrators and insurers are convinced that fully
embracing well-designed automated tools is the key to success and
growth.
Yet there are few new major entries, due to the
extremely high dollar investment required to put a comprehensive
claims management/risk management system into the market.
Therefore, in a mature yet potentially explosive
marketplace, how do outsiders enter?
By exploiting chinks in the industry's armor.
These outsiders become specialty or niche vendors;
their focus is on improving or augmenting one or a few key aspects of
the risk management process, pre- and/or post-loss.
Vendors of comprehensive systems, on the other
hand, concentrate on providing their core specialty capabilities,
typically some type of claims adjudication and analysis software with
increasingly user-friendly software. Because today's system
architectures are more compatible with other applications (i.e.,
``plug and play''), vendors are able to market more easily their
smaller, niche- oriented applications.
So it is with many provider/vendors in the RMIS
industry today. A large percentage-at least one-third-of those on the
annual Business Insurance list of RMIS providers can be defined as
niche players. So can larger firms with demonstrated success in other
markets-such as health care or benefits-that also desire to carve out
their own niche in a new functional area.
Here are several niche firms that serve as
examples of this notion:
* Certificates Management Solutions, Near North
National Group, Chicago (www.nnng.com). Focus area: certificates of
insurance and bonds tracking and issuance.
The mission of CMS, which is part of Near North
National Group of Chicago, is to provide risk managers with an
in-depth, comprehensive tracking and issuance tool, in both
Web-enabled and desktop versions, for certificates of insurance (and
bonds).
There are several certificates-tracking systems
for a variety of technical platforms with varying degrees of
functionality. Yet CMS is unique in two ways: First, it is extremely
detailed and technically robust-combining scanning, browsing and
database technologies-while maintaining ease of use. Second, CMS is a
specialized division within a large insurance brokerage firm and has
single focus: providing a technical tool to a mundane-yet
critical-task of a risk management department.
* Industrial Health Strategies Inc., Providence,
R.I. (www.industrialhealth.com). Focus area: claims profiling and job
site work assessment.
IHS is a workers compensation consulting firm
specializing in disability management. It has developed an expert
system called ACES (Accelerated Case/Claim Evaluation System), which
automatically profiles claims for potential ``delayed recovery'' by
analyzing more than 100 claim variables. Claims are ranked in order of
potential significance, from 1 to 3, with 3s-the high-risk
claims-typically being the ones targeted for ultimate adverse
development. Once identified, such cases can be given early attention.
On the other side, ACES identifies claims that do
not show a tendency to adversely develop, allowing adjusters and case
managers to confidently expedite such claims. Combined with a
comprehensive claims management/adjudication system, ACES could assist
claim professionals and risk managers to gain an early focus on the
right things. It's already in place at Beacon Mutual Insurance Co. in
Warwick, R.I., the state's largest workers comp insurer, with
favorable results.
* MiddleFork Technologies Inc., Chicago
(www.middleforktech.com). Focus area: interactive/expert medical
system for claims and case management professionals.
MFT is a new software firm that is launching a
series of interactive expert medical systems aimed at providing
desktop training for claims and case management professionals. The
software series is called ``Essential Medicine for Insurance-Related
Claims.'' The first module centers on herniated discs. The basic
premise is that claims professionals frequently are in need of medical
expertise in order to understand injuries, disabilities, procedures
and the like. Typically, they would rely on staff or expert physicians
who would come by on a regular basis to discuss cases and the medical
issues that help adjusters understand the medical implications of
disability.
Based on my experience as a former adjuster, it
would have been great to have a radiologist, neurosurgeon, orthopedic
surgeon or other health specialist at my beck and call to answer
specific questions. Enter ``Essential Medicine.'' The goal of the
system is to supplement/supplant the role of the expert medical
adviser who teaches these critical items to adjusters. As part of a
comprehensive claims adjudication system, this type of product can aid
in reducing claim operating expenses and improving the ultimate
reserving process.
* OCI, Cheyenne, Wyo., part of UNUM Corp.
(www.ociwyo.com). Focus area: custom construction of
enterprise-specific data warehouses for comprehensive risk management
analysis.
OCI is yet another example of a larger company
that specializes in the group benefits area entering the
property/casualty arena with a niche product. OCI provides a
total-cost-of-risk figure by integrating data from group medical,
disability and property/casualty information into one source.
Essentially, the firm designs unique data warehouses for each client
and uses the Internet as a report and analysis delivery vehicle. It
does not matter what the data source or provider is; OCI combines all
the data into one data warehouse and builds a custom reporting package
for each client.
* Software Technologies Corp., Monrovia, Calif.
(www.stc.com). Focus area: database integration, consolidation and
conversion technology.
This firm provides data and systems integration
for companies with diverse systems and databases. Although the company
already has successfully built a solid client base in the group health
benefit insurance arena, it is beginning to enter the
property/casualty side. Its tool, called ``DataGate,'' integrates data
of disparate sources and types. With so many different data layouts,
cost- efficient and accurate data conversion is perhaps the biggest
challenge in the RMIS industry. STC seeks to provide that silver
bullet for effective data conversion. Time will tell whether it
succeeds in this difficult environment.
* Walker, West, Wong & Associates, Boston
(www.walkerwestwong.com). Focus area: Internet-based risk management
information system using existing client software and systems.
WWW is a small but full-service injury care
management consulting organization specializing primarily in workers
comp and other property/casualty exposures. In a somewhat similar
fashion to OCI, WWW seeks to use, not replace, a client's existing
vendors and systems. It does so by installing Internet-based products
called WebDimensions/RMIS and RapidReports, developed in partnership
with AXIM Systems of Medford, Mass.
RapidReports performs the critical generation of
early first reports of accidents via the Internet/intranet, and
WebDimensions/RMIS does analysis and report generation by extracting
critical case and injury management information from RMIS systems-as
well as adjuster notes/logs-through the Internet/intranet.
This is just a sample. Many new firms or
product-services such as these come to my attention each year. The
list grows all the time.
The large, comprehensive systems cannot do it all.
They either lack the funds, market incentive, or expertise to develop
all of the niche players' functionality. Yet, with the integration of
systems becoming more commonplace, infusion of these types of software
programs is much easier. I therefore see a lot of synergistic and
partnership arrangements taking place over the next few years.
What does this mean to the vendor? Plenty. Niche
players improve the state of the RMIS industry. Through technology,
increased scrutiny is brought to bear on a particular issue. In some
cases, the additional cost of the software can be more than justified
by the savings the program generates through improved efficiency.
Obviously these niche systems are beneficial to
the ultimate end user-the risk manager. You should evaluate your RMIS
provider to see whether it provides these or other types of niche
software capabilities, especially if they are critical to your own
needs.
Talk with your provider to see how it can adapt
some of these capabilities, or whether it can establish a strategic
relationship to do so.
David A. Tweedy is principal of Tweedy Risk
Consulting in Barrington, R.I. Mr. Tweedy's column on risk management
information systems appears quarterly. Copyright
Business Insurance 1999 |