|
Risk management information systems (RMIS)
development has never been an effort that many organizations would
take on all by themselves. And yet today there are many tools that
would appear to make that task easier than ever. The illusion created
by a graphical user interface (GUI) that systems were becoming easier
to use has contributed greatly to this idea. I am still searching for
the systems implementor that believes client/server is easier to
install and support. The fact is that these systems are far more
complex to develop and install, especially for an organization that
grew up on older, perhaps simpler technology.
But wait, the new Web technology seems to have
taken us back to the older minals, we have surfers and browsers. Now
that sounds more user friendly. The development of these
RMIS tools and the deployment of these new systems must certainly be
easier.
Or is it?
I think at times we become too focused on the
technology and not the underlying functionality required for the RMIS
users. Large insurance carriers and large third-party administrators
and even large self-insureds certainly have the resources to develop
RMIS. But resources are not the only issue. I think it is a great
compliment to the organizations that go outside of their own
development group to meet customer needs. It can also mean a
competitive advantage for them because of greater speed in their
development effort. The issues of skill sets required, available
resources, new tools and technology and, of course, cost can lead to
the outsourcing decision.
There are many current examples of organizations
going outside their own development group. There are an equal number
of reasons for this. Many software providers have continued to form
strategic alliances to meet customer needs, but now these alliances
are also being formed by large organizations to meet customer
requirements.
Internal partnerships between information services
(IS) and the risk management department can also be a critical success
factor. At Wausau Insurance Cos., the organizational structure
supports the linkage between these partners. Obviously we would
like to control strategic projects but a triad of resources is usually
the approach, states Jim Pimler, assistant vice president,
information services for Wausau. The team of business
specialists, IS professionals, and our vendor partners provide the
cross-functional perspective required by projects, he adds.
In talking with Jeff Hoffman, assistant vice
president from Chubb Insurance Group, the issue of going outside was
more an issue of focus. Insurance companies in general must
focus on their core operational software, quoting, policy issuance,
invoicing, claim payment. Clients are demanding different functions,
such as more analytical tools that require a different focus than
operational software, he continued. Indeed, the data structures
for data warehousing and data mining are far different from a
transactional database.
Web-based tools also require a different
perspective from a development perspective. Wausau has developed new
Web-based claim reporting capabilities (Rapid Reports) with the help
of Walker, West, Wong and Axim Inc., a Boston-based Web developer.
Speed was the issue for us, according
to Tom Drake, vice president at Wausau. We needed to supplement
our team with a group that has created these type of products already,
he added. They expect to be operational soon. The first report
capability will be part of Horizon, which contains a vast array of
leading edge, Web-based services.
The bottom line of both of these developments is
that the we can build it here attitude within large
organizations and even smaller companies has been replaced with a
strong customer focus. Customer-driven RMIS development using the
necessary resources regardless of where they come from can benefit all
of us.
David P. Duden is national RMIS practice leader
for Deloitte & Touche LLP in Hartford, Conn. |