|
In my years of working with customers on technology
issues, I cannot recall a time when technology was affecting all of us
in such a profound and direct way. The rapid rate of change and the
adoption of technology in our lives is increasing at supersonic speed.
We can't escape it, but perhaps we can simplify the use and maximize
the results of our risk management technology.
For many of us, the technology people have been
those "techies'' in the back room who did their thing and from
whom we stayed away. Perhaps Computer Science was just an elective in
college that kept you at a terminal late at night until your "job''
ran properly. But replacing manual processes with automation was
enough of a solution at that time.
Saving time and growing a business without adding
staff was the promise of automation, of course. Little attention was
devoted to workflow and the cultural change that many went through in
their journey to an automated office. And the people generally
responsible for the automation buying decisions were rarely the
full-time users of the system.
Today, technology cannot be left at the office.
School children are expected to use the computer beginning in
kindergarten, and Internet access is coming at us through the phone
wire, cable TV and the airwaves. When was the last time you saw an
advertisement without a www address attached? Surprisingly, most
respondents to a recent survey listed Internet access as being more
easily available at home rather that at the office.
Certainly, risk management technology is not immune
to the tremendous changes that are occurring. Within the last 12
months, we have seen a tremendous overhaul of the RMIS software
industry. Changes not only in technology but in the strategic
direction of the RMIS providers have promised a new era, perhaps one
in which risk managers and insurance professionals will create more
innovation through their use of technology.
Getting a pulse on this new era of risk technology
has been a challenge. The fluctuations in the marketplace have been
occurring at an incredible rate. At a time when technology companies
are doing well overall, the risk technology vendors cannot afford to
implement new technology. These companies must try to satisfy the
existing client base while providing leading solutions to a growing
group of prospective clients. The approach to this
when-to-stop-the-upgrades problem has varied. While some vendors
simply create a cutoff date, others try to encourage clients to move
to new technology for added functionality. Depending on the
application, the decisions can be critical.
As we approach the year 2000, many companies are
using the threat of the Year 2000 problem as a reason for upgrading
their technology. I hope these companies do not lose sight of the
necessary functionality they need to improve their technology beyond a
four-digit date field.
Ultimately, the issues surrounding your technology
decisions often have more to do with the personalities of the people
involved than the bits and bytes of the computer. Workflow is still
dependent on people even though our computers may dictate a certain
methodology. In an era of increasing power and complexity on the
computer screen, let's keep our focus on the human element.
David P. Duden is the National RMIS Practice
Leader and head of the RMISLab at Deloitte & Touche LLP in
Hartford, Conn. He can be reached electronically at dduden@dttus.com. |