|
THREE WEEKS have now elapsed since the
closing of the annual Risk & Insurance Management Society's
conference. Each year I try to anticipate what the vendors will be
providing in the way of new functionality and/or technical gadgetry.
Typically, technology, functionality and market dynamics-that is, new
players entering, old players leaving and key personnel movement-are
the top three issues every year.
Over the last three years, it hasn't been all that
difficult to predict. Anything to do with workers compensation has
monopolized vendors' presentations. Most new systems or modules had
something to do with workers comp claims or medical cost management.
And, true enough, there were plenty of systems and
vendors touting some form of workers comp management-from financing to
medical management to loss control.
However, this year was somewhat different. While
workers compensation remained an important emphasis of the systems,
there was much more of an emphasis on technology. And there were some
significant changes in certain vendor's strategic direction.
What does remain constant, however, is that the
annual RIMS conference, more than any other, is the chance for each
vendor to make a statement as to their product/service line. This
essentially is a reflection of their general financial vitality and
technological innovation. Therefore, most will tend to have any new
services or software releases available to release at the RIMS
conference. Here are some observations of the risk management
information system industry based on the conference:
Fine-tuning of the functional product line. The
RMIS marketplace is somewhat mature in nature. There are fewer truly
new products coming out. Rather, a major trend is a re-tooling and/or
``re-positioning'' of existing software allocations. Another trend is
developing these applications for interactive system environments to
tap into other system environments like human resources, disability,
finance, underwriting, legal and executive information systems.
Windows, Windows, Windows.... Perhaps the most
obvious observation was that many vendors-even mainframe/timeshare
stalwarts like Corporate Systems Ltd., Risk Sciences Group Inc. and
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.-have embraced Microsoft Corp.'s immensely
popular operating system, Windows. Stand-alone vendors like Pyramid
Services Inc. and Anistics have their versions.
Windows' popularity is mostly derived from its
user-friendly design because of its graphical user interface format.
Of course, the degree to which each vendor's product is
Windows-oriented is the question. Several vendors only had a few
screens or applications ready for the RIMS conference. Others, by
design, will only have selective parts available on a Windows
environment.
One thing is certain, however: Windows and RMIS
appear to be in for a long-term relationship.
More technology. In addition to the move to
Windows, vendors are also increasing their investment in new
technologies which have long been in existence-in information
technology terms:
Client-server technology. Client-server is an
advanced system technology that is more or less self-explanatory. It
means that the data storage and data base management facilities reside
at the server level, while the application software, operating system,
user interface, etc., are distributed among the users or clients.
Essentially, it ties together diverse hardware platforms through a
common operating system. The server can be a mainframe, midrange or a
personal computer that serves as the coordinator/processor for the
other computer platforms hooked into it.
Most vendors in the exhibition hall did not yet
have fully functional client/server products, though they are in
development at many of the leading vendors. The technology is still in
its infancy as to wholesale usage, especially in the risk management
area.
Graphical user interface. This has become a common
enough term today, with the widespread usage of Microsoft's Windows
and Apple's Macintosh products. The great advantage of GUI is that it
makes using the system much easier to use. The ``point and click'' on
icons method appeals to the non-technical user.
However, remember that ease of use is only one
characteristic when measuring the true value of a RMIS. I'd take a
functional, somewhat more difficult-to-use program any day over an
easy-to-use but functionally limited program. So don't be overly
``wowed'' by the demonstrations. Ask, instead, for the true substance
of the system's analysis capability.
Multi-tasking. Essentially, this is the ability to
run multiple applications concurrently. Many vendors with
client/server systems under design will point to this as a great
feature...and it is. But do you really need to have your own system
run two simultaneous programs?
If you have a large self-administered claims
program and you want the system to do claims administration and run
financial analyses, maybe you do need the multi-tasking ability. But
most risk management operations do not need that degree of computing
technology and power.
Dynamic data linking. This allows various
applications to be linked, so as new data flows in or out of one
application it is actually updated in all other applications using
that data. Dynamic data linking between applications is only possible
through the use of ``dynamic data exchange'' and "object linking
and embedding.''
DDE provides a communications link between the
server program where the data resides and client program that requests
the data. OLE allows the data to be exchanged between applications and
retains the link between the data and the applications program from
which it came. OLE allows the user not only to link data but also
applications from within its operating environments. Although Windows
and OS/2 comprise the lion's share of the client/server GUI based
markets, there are others to consider as well. Most notable are UNIX
and International Business Machine Corp.'s version of UNIX, AIX.
Indispensable management tools. These improvements
are being hailed by the vendors as critical in the assessment,
measurement, analysis and handling of risk. One of the most used
buzzwords of the last two years in ``benchmarking.'' Most system
vendors (as well as consultants) are emphasizing the importance of a
well-designed RMIS sitting atop ``solid industry data'' from which to
make useful comparisons and conclusions about one's own situation.
While much of it is hype, I do believe that the RMIS is a great tool
in conducting comparative studies.
This year's conference was most informative
regarding the short-term direction of RMIS. These systems, and their
vendors, are positioning themselves to be an indispensable part of the
risk management and insurance community by being the vital data links
to multiple data sources. The net result of the re-tooling of
functional applications, increased ease-of-use, and improved
interactivity among diverse systems is an improved management tool
which is useful up and down the corporate hierarchy. Also, these
systems will be equally important to service providers like insurers,
brokers, third-party administrators and specialty consultants.
Copyright© 1994 Business Insurance |